Kevin Zander
Kevin Zander
> > Not sure if this is the right place to comment for this > > Thanks. It's not, really. I was going to comment on the closed Coding Conventions...
> > > Does anyone have an idea why CI is failing? AppVeyor is talking about [building `cds.lib`](https://ci.appveyor.com/project/Lukas-W/lmms/builds/32642203/job/jrxfanhd4sxt295u#L489) and then continues to complain that [`libcds-amd64-dbg.lib` does not exist](https://ci.appveyor.com/project/Lukas-W/lmms/builds/32642203/job/jrxfanhd4sxt295u#L886): > >...
> > > @Veratil yes, see the PR's description: > > > This includes a a new submodule, [`libcds`](https://github.com/khizmax/libcds), which is a collection of concurrent and lock-free data structures. Ah,...
> Issue and fix confirmed. I'm curious about when this happened and why. Probably some old/odd upgrade path that we've since fixed.
Related: #5592 #5944
> namespacing LMMS would also yield the future possibility of splitting up into a frontend/GUI application and a business-logic library that could be used in other projects without any danger...
> hasn't the pr been merged? It doesn't mean that the issue is done though.
> Just as a reminder: #6194 This has nothing to do with core though.
> > This has nothing to do with core though. > > Oh would we _keep_ QT for UI even if/when we outfaced it in core! I diddent realize that...
> (I might've misunderstood that last point of yours. You were asking how this PR will be a beneficial route correct?) Yep, seeing if we agree this would be a...