Vitalii Kryvenko
Vitalii Kryvenko
``` tings -> things commtis -> commits directorires -> directories cocatenated -> concatenated uploadds -> uploads ```
I just found this interesting crate `frunk` that allows one to project structs already using the [`transmogrify`](https://docs.rs/frunk/latest/frunk/#transmogrifying) operation
Hi, thank you for creating the issue! I see the use case here. What you could do today with `bon` is that you can reuse a "common set of data"...
I'd rather do this later. It's going to be a big feature and require a bunch of internal refactoring. Right now, for example, there are several problems with `cfg/cfg_attrs` support...
I'm closing this issue in favour of https://github.com/elastio/bon/issues/147
> Have you seen anyone implement and use a copying logic I haven't. On the surface, the toolchains look well-isolated - a single directory per toolchain. This does require some...
Hi! I may be misinterpreting the issue, but here is how I understand this. You want to have different behavior for when the setter is not called vs when you...
Hi, thank you for opening the issue! The idea of `#[builder(flatten)]` is clear, however, its implementation is quite complicated. The main problem here is that macros don't have access to...
If you'd like to make it work with the existing version of `bon`, you can do so by using a method-based builder syntax. However, in this case you still need...
Note that it adds syntax for "named function arguments" via builders (deriving a builder from a function/method) which could be a separate section. For this there aren't more mature popular...