Utkarsh Agarwal
Utkarsh Agarwal
Hello @dlvenable, Just wanted to check, Would modifying the current pattern `"(\\d[ -]*?){13,16}"` to `"\\b(?:\\d[ -]*?){13,16}\\b"`, help in this particular scenario ?
Tested the scenario at my end and could observe the following - ### Using Pattern - `(\\d[ -]*?){13,16}` | Input Data | Output Data | |---|---| | fd55555069-e7a9-11ee4111111111111111 | fd55555069-e7a9-11ee##########...
@wbeckler @adilnaimi - Just want to re-confirm my understanding that we are looking for a method which we have in `opensearch.py` package to ingest the data to the Pipeline instead...
@dblock I believe, while creating the authentication for the client we need to provide the service as `osis` and then we can leverage options like `client.ingestion_pipeline(...)`
@dblock - Yeah, we can have it as a plugin, because it would only have one functionality to send the data over http/https to the Ingestion Pipeline. Further, I would...
Got it, Thanks a lot for these details @dblock, it made things super clear. I would start my research on this on how to implement it. Since, I would be...
Hello @dlvenable - Yes, if we have a support for `_bulk` or `_doc`, then it might help, and we need not create a different plugin in `opensearch.py` to send the...
Thanks a lot @dlvenable for the review, I have addressed that comment also added a additional unit test `testProcessorWithMultiplePatternsWithSingleWordOnly`.
If the team, is ok to have this feature. I would be more than happy to work on this.