Ulises Gascón

> For 4.x, this file indicates versions that are tested against. So we require Node.js 0.10 or later. While this is a very old version, we should still state it...

> Hey @UlisesGascon. Do you mind if I create my blog post pull request once the blog’s structure is officially merged? It’ll make it easier for me to format it....

I will start to work on this

I just invested some time to check what is missing potentially in [the migration guide](https://expressjs.com/en/guide/migrating-5.html) and [the 5.x API](https://expressjs.com/en/5x/api.html) based on [the changelog](https://github.com/expressjs/express/blob/5.x/History.md) ### Legend - 🍿 it is ignored...

This PR is not a draft anymore, feel free to merge it when you are ready @wesleytodd

based on the CI [output](https://github.com/expressjs/express/actions/runs/10098854883/job/27957519337?pr=5595), should we skip this tests in 21? Due the known QUERY issue. 

This PR is now closed as https://github.com/expressjs/express/pull/5803 was merged including this change :partying_face:

Hey @floratmin! Thanks for bring the topic :) Do you want to work on it and prepare a PR?

> Is there any way to configure the analysis? Yes, @CesarD. You can change the rules (with some limitations), [here](https://codeclimate.com/repos/63d38f8934442600e155cfea/settings/analysis_config/edit) Also you can manage individual issues status (so you can...

Hola @xavidop! Muchas gracias por el testimonio 😎 Para la web uso [Docusaurus](https://docusaurus.io/) y para la parte de PDF uso un editor de texto corriente. No he dado con una...