Tory9
Tory9
@DonLakeFlyer i have implemented the changes you mentioned. Could you please review if it is okay now?
Hello @DonLakeFlyer, could you pls let me know if there is anything you need me to address before the dev call tomorrow? We're hoping to get this ready for final...
Thanks so much for the final review and merge, @DonLakeFlyer. Since the PX4 part of this feature will be in its next release, we're hopeful this can make it into...
@HTRamsey, hello. The PX4 side was merged this week. Can this pr be reviewed again ?
@HTRamsey thank you for the review, I have applied the suggested changes
Thank you, I applied the suggestion. Let me know if it looks better now. I have limited access to hardware to test these new changes, but if you confirm the...
@DonLakeFlyer thanks for the review, I get your point. I’ve attached a short PDF explaining the current approach. I would appreciate your suggestions for a more acceptable alternative [QGC resilience...
You’re right, if there are multiple receivers supporting this message, each will indeed send its own separate GNSS_IDENTITY telemetry. I also find it a bit confusing how potentially different resilience...
For now, the firmware doesn’t really use this information for decision-making. It’s mainly passed to the GCS to provide environmental awareness and because it can be useful or interesting for...
Got it, thanks! Yeah, with this message still being in development there will definitely be some complications. I believe a PR to move it into the common dialect should be...