Tom Tranter

FYI - there is a PyBaMM change to experiments coming in to the next release imminently so might make sense to wait for that https://github.com/pybamm-team/PyBaMM/pull/2960

It does support drive cycles but stopping and re-starting simulations with old solution is not totally straight forward. Our plan is to merge liionpack into PyBaMM so the solvers and...

Apologies for not checking these issues regularly. I need to sort out my github notifications. As discussed on the PyBaMM discussion this functionality needs to be added. Liionpack only works...

Fantastic thanks. Will you be joining the dev meeting later? I will play with it now and may have a few questions

@wigging yes we changed how timescale is implemented recently in pybamm. Can you run it with the suggested option for a scalar timescale

The reason I have set it up as a sim_func is that the function gets run on every sub-process which is less expensive and memory intensive than passing objects to...

@tinosulzer we can set it up and see what the speed is like for a large problem, maybe we could actually get away with passing an unbuilt simulation

These papers by Reniers and Howey and Schimpe et al. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.10245.pdf, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306261917315696?via%3Dihub use "cell", "block", "module", "rack", "compartment" terminology: _i.e. the lowest level are called ‘cells’, a group of parallel-connected...

Great ideas, I had thought about making one big system but you do need the stepping for the thermal equations if you include external sources and cell to cell connections...

@tinosulzer would you have time to work on this?