Tingchen-G
Tingchen-G
Thank you for your response! Yes the sorting takes longer on the second loop, just like in @RobertoDF's comment. But for every loop, I have `del ops, st, clu, tF,...
I see, I'll try sorting them all together. Regarding hardware, we're using GPU: GeForce GTX 1080Ti, 11GB memory; Processor: Intel i7-9700, 48GB memory, and we are sorting on SSD.
Also, I noticed that the final clustering step takes the longest time. For a shank that took 11.5hrs to run, 13,844,472 spikes are extracted for first clustering, but 43,478,695 spikes...
Sorry for the late reply! Here are the spike counts for each shank: Shank 1: 23,946,723 Shank 2: 26,824,833 Shank 3: 40,672,509 Shank 4: 43,187,385 Shank 5: 32,859,009 Shank 6:...
Hi! Sorry for the delay. Sure, we could share the files. May I ask how to share the binary file? the compressed file is still too big to share on...
I see, sure! Here is the dropbox link: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/4j65b003lqp3c5umfbhf0/shank3.zip?rlkey=lqz3fuepdbv3hkl99vswuz1ha&st=h1uaym6n&dl=0
Hi, I am now running kilosort on a new set of data of similar sizes, and this issue seems to be solved! Now each shank takes around 2hrs, which is...