TheKodeToad

Oh, thanks!

I'm slightly confused what makes them optional. Unless you're forcing me to do the rest /j!

Well it's still good to see whether everything is done.

There is nothing we can do due to #123 - considering it works in other launchers this is probably fixed.

Since merge of #123 this can no longer be considered.

I don't think there's really a risk with themes, right?

What is this setting? Edit: from looking at the code it seems to be "Sandbox .jar installer" in the miscellaneous settings. I'm leaving this here for future reference ;)

> For example you could have 3 instances: "skyblock" "TerrainBundle", and "Vaporblock", while these would be in the order just shown, you might want "skyblock" and "Vaporblock" to be next...

Why not keep the old non-qml view which works just fine?

Yeah - I had a similar idea. > (instance elements don't act like other widgets) I don't know what you mean, but won't this make the problem worse?