The-going
The-going
> That information is known at build time. So potentially saving it to /etc/armbian-image-release or /etc/armbian-release I think that information about the capabilities of the loader should be located directly...
> I agree that makes logical sense. However, I'm concerned with having similar information located in various places around the system. Armbian already has armbianEnv.txt, armbian-release and armbian-image-release (there may...
> I would suggest to have one generic config (structure) below /etc/armbian/ similar to many other debian packages and the toolset is responsible to do any change (to be done...
> I'm very sorry, I'm using Ubuntu 24.04 which is not supported, I can only compile using docker. I use openSUSE and run in QEMU\KVM+ Virtual Machine Manager
On ubuntu-22.04 all build target done, but 1 bpi-f3 fail On ubuntu-24.04 12 target fail Did I understand correctly?
Currently, there is an old and bad external compiler mechanism in the build system. It's bad because everything is loaded, but you only need to download the necessary version for...
> I don't know if the current packaging versioning logic can handle that case, (i.e. can you have a 24.5.1 and a 24.5.3 version of the same kernel i.e. 6.6.36?)...
> It spits out some sort of kernel source package, but I think `{version}` is still missing since I couldn't get it to work and probably needs more fixes until...
I apologize. I will not take part in this development.
> the system on emmc I got this error panic: Is the file system on eMMC OK?