Björn Kettunen
Björn Kettunen
What would be best to replace advice?
I don't think this a good change. If there is no content it should not be shown as such but as summary.
I get that but putting the summary into the content tag makes it harder to detect if there is actual content. Further what if there's a summary and content?
Comparing this version and the Qt version only downside I see is that the Qt version looks native while the Rust version looks alien. Qt for the Gui would work...
Isn't this just replacing one big blob (well a shell script isn't technically a blob but this one is very big) with another? Compared to that a Makefile is much...
Steve Purcell ***@***.***> writes: > purcell left a comment (ledger/ledger-mode#432) > >> Isn't this just replacing one big blob (well a shell script isn't >> technically a blob but this...
Aaron Zeng ***@***.***> writes: > I think makem.sh doesn't support installing the Elisp files into site-lisp (a la `make install`). > > However, I think this is an acceptable removal....
Aaron Zeng ***@***.***> writes: > bcc32 left a comment (ledger/ledger-mode#432) > >> I don't think that's a fair argument. Packages can come from distribution >> packages, it's a common practice....
Would it work if dirvish would reuse the builtin bookmark system instead?
IMHO at least for retail the default should be to not undercut. There is no reason to undercut another person in retail.