Results 5 comments of Travis McNeill

Ok so maybe tombstones is not the correct word. It would just be node that instead of being deleted you would make it's element be a special object (in clojure's...

I'm wrong. I will explain the problem better later.

So I think my idea of lseq+tombstones might decrease the overhead of messages, but it also might not. My thinking was that getting the merge operation for lseq would make...

I don't know if you could have a merge function (as apposed to an add function) because LSEQ isn't a constantly growing data structure. You could have a special structure...

If this seems right to you (I haven't fully implemented a lseq-tree fully or version vectors yet so it's as best I can reckon with my understanding) we should make...