Andrey Anshin

Yep in Airflow we start collect and analyse recently warnings during tests run, and could confirm that there are a lot of warnings comes from the azure-sdk packages Known invalid...

The is also `azure-batch` and `azure-synapse-artifacts` raises this warnings https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-python/issues/35364#issuecomment-2077348574 I could help with check when packages released either in the Airflow’s CI or locally build image with latest dependencies.

IMHO, technically it could be added as a separate Provider with access through [apache-airflow-client](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-client/), but as every new provider it should comes comes thought [Accepting new community providers](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/PROVIDERS.rst#accepting-new-community-providers) process. So...

> This can be caused by any number of things. Maybe instead of remove describe that kind of things and how it could be analysed.

This rendered because you have `.sql` suffix in the end of your string. In this case it will tried to read template from the template file without rendering file path

> works when sql="sql/{{ params.test }}.sql" does not? It doesn't work by design, see: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39651#issuecomment-2113385429 > Curious why sql="{% include 'sql/' ~ params.test ~ '.sql' %}" works It is just...

- **Tests / Static checks, mypy, docs / Static checks (pull_request)**: Rebase your branch to the current `main` and this should be gone - **Tests / Static checks, mypy, docs...

This static check failure not relevant your PR, it will be fix (at least temporary) by https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39662

What happen if you change your script to? ```python import time if __name__ == '__main__': for i in range(10): time.sleep(2) print(f"RUNNING {i}") ```

I guess it similar to https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/39686