Michael Winsor

> This is a really open question: does anyone have a real world use case where using `System.Numerics` shows a noticeable difference? > > On full games, these operations are...

> You can use .NET Core 3.1+ or .NET 5 with WPF/WinForms, if that's what you mean. I'm aware of this, but the designer for WinForms in its current unfinished...

> @Tape-Worm System.Numerics performance is highly dependant on the target framework AND the compiler you use. System.Numerics are SIMD accelerated only on a number of scenarios, one of those is,...

@Jjagg Sorry, I had removed the code in favor of SharpDX. I restored it to Sys.Numerics tonight though, and did a .NET 5 conversion. I've attached a zip file with...

@roeyskoe What the??? Really? Oh man, something's definitely not right on my end then. Time to crack open the profiler I guess.

The purpose was to see how the numerics stack up against each other, I was just so surprised by the poor performance in NET 5 I included it, but I...

FYI, this problem is getting very difficult to manage. The workaround provided only works for simple projects. Anything remotely complex (e.g. with custom controls embedded into the form) starts becoming...

It's just the standard workaround where you make the project target multiple frameworks, one for 4.8 and the other for 5.0. The other workaround where you link to a control/form...

Thank you

Yep, that's what I've been getting. I could be wrong, but that designer looks like it's a standard .NET designer? That could be why you're not seeing anything in the...