Ted Thibodeau Jr

@nigelmegitt I should have included the DID WG... See https://github.com/w3c/did-spec-registries/ I'm having a bit of a brain fog, and can't quickly locate the VCWG or CCG registries I was thinking...

Also, it should be (easily) possible for WG and CG chairs, if not all participants, to learn who is the liaison with any given liaised organization, and what to do...

The current title of this issue — [PROPOSAL: Spec will recommend AGAINST Issuer Verifier flows over https](https://github.com/w3c-ccg/vc-api/issues/186) — suggests that the protocol used for the flow (HTTPS) is the concern,...

> [@David-Chadwick] I propose that the issuer is an object, in the same way that issuer and subject is. Probably that's meant to `propose that the` **_`issuee`_** `is an object`?

> [@SmithSamuelM] The current VC model is filled with such layer violations because it intentionally flattens layers it should not flatten I (and I presume, the other members of the...

I think that `issuee` can deliver what many are wanting to get from the mis-named "`holder` binding". `issuee` can be defined simply, as the "initial `holder` to whom the `issuer`...

> 1. IANA maintains all registries It makes sense for us to use IANA registries *where they exist*, but I'm not sure we have the power, authority, or right to...

Presumably the plan is also to move the repo from `/msporny/` to somewhere beneath `/w3c/` upon adoption as described?

@fantasai — Keeping in mind that I did not create the diagram, only cleaned up a number of existing inconsistencies and (to my eye) errors, I think several of your...

> Since the pull request was landed first, it is marked as merged, but the commit has now been reverted. I'll make a new pull request when/if we agree on...