Ted Thibodeau Jr

Since you're basically reinventing NNTP and IMAP4, I recommend reading their RFCs carefully.

Note that GitHub's "Discussions" are not really discussions. They are a reinvention of the Q&A sites like StackOverflow. They do not thread properly; they associate multiple "answers" to the initial...

From my seat, the issue is actually that several non-English values of `dbr:France rdfs:comment` (which only has one value loaded, which is English) are incorrectly found within `dbr:Franca rdfs:comment`, which...

I strongly prefer the prefix form to the suffix form. Addressing the examples above.... * To my mind, `Working Draft`, `Editor's Draft`, `Patent Review Draft`, and `Discontinued Draft` are truncations...

> [@frivoal] What I like about the suffix form (in addition to consistency) is that it puts emphasis with the word Draft. I think consistency can be achieved with either...

My last point: English generally puts adjectives before the noun they modify; `Draft ` is more "natural" than ` Draft`. This ordering is different in other languages.

Consistency, even if it's not my favorite, is preferable to the status quo.

Widespread confusion persists about how to interpret the lowercase "should", even with the [RFC 2119](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2119) and [RFC 8174](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8174) citations early in the spec. Contrary to what is found in those...

> I think it's OK to exempt the [uses of "should"] in non-normative sections. It's OK, but I recommend not. Again, it is common for readers to read the lowercase...

@csarven -- I think your https://github.com/solid/vocab/pull/81#pullrequestreview-1110815557 (and any followup to it) would be more appropriate on issue #79 than on this PR which is meant to apply the result of...