Tomer
Tomer
Looks like the page is down, @idanmel did you move it?
I realise that this pull request accidentally contains #83 . I'll take care of that soon.
An [issue](https://bugs.python.org/issue34439) was opened in the official cpython tracker to request better access to the custom prompt value
For version specific smells like #58 we need: - [ ] Every `LintSmell` needs to specify if it works on an old version of python. - [ ] Smell fixing...
This is proving harder than expected, not sure how to do it without subclassing the AST module with things like parent-pointers, which seems costly both in runtime and refactoring
Can look at https://github.com/asottile/pyupgrade which already implemented this for `"""insparation"""`
My problem isn't putting breakpoints. I want the option to only view the red spots in the gutter - Only highlight the uncovered lines
I tried this. it work, if a bit cumbersome. Some of the settings are described/named in a bit of a confusing way, and the combination of #132 and #169 make...
Actually looking at it again - I'm not sure your solution works
@aldanor Why not then do something along the lines of ```py @pytest.mark.parametrize('test_name',[parameters for parameters in existing_parameter_generation() if make_sense(parameters)] ``` and that way not generate them