TMHBOFH
TMHBOFH
Hi bupd, thanks for your work on the PR! I tested it and from my perspective, it doesn’t seem to support the functionality for nested groups. Or is your focus...
Hello @bupd, Thanks for your feedback. You're absolutely right that your approach is the more flexible solution. However, I'm still having some trouble to understanding how to handle normal user...
@bupd Thank for your feedback. I have understood the procedure you described. What I mean, is that I would like to use LDAP groups also as groups in Harbor as...
@bupd Alright, once the PR has been accepted, I'll merge your changes and open another PR
@shoeper with this PR #658 the sha256 hash will also shown mfg
> * Correct me if I am wrong, but I think you can accomplish the same thing by adding member:1.2.840.113556.1.4.1941 into the group filter. This way, there is no need...
> My goal here is to make it possible but, at the same time, not adding AD specifics into it. I understand your goal and want to support you as...
@Vad1mo I did some more research on how others handle this topic. My suggestion would be to use the group filter as you described and check it for the relevant...
I’ve implemented the [alternative](https://github.com/TMHBOFH/harbor/commit/bf33ffc69e4cd177c67c239dd37f65b46b6c2cba) I described earlier. My tests was been successful so far. I believe this version is much more flexible. If you agree, I’ll go ahead and close...
Alright, I've updated the PR accordingly and I hope everything is fine now. I’d be happy if it could make it into 2.14. Thanks a lot to all of you!