TCROC

> Why not only shark? I'm not apposed to this 🤔. I kinda like it actually. We have 2 good contenders now! :) I believe @trvswgnr also suggested scampi in...

@nonetrix > Also, may I ask is there plans to change the language more than this, or just keeping faithful to the original and tracking upstream upstream tracking is the...

I'm personally in support of the ``convert [from-to-target]`` with ``convert [target]`` shorthand. Its clear concise and explains what is happening in the command.

Experimental. Maybe even as a subcommand: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch14-05-extending-cargo.html

Which would mean a new repository under the CrabLang umbrella. ^ This is probably the easiest way to start.

> why not support both extensions? Are you suggesting supporting both ``.rs`` and ``.crab``? If so, that is also what I propose! :) I don't ever want to stop supporting...

This will be in our "easy to use new super awesome gateway language" to introduce users from C#, Java, JavaScript, Python, etc. to the way of the crab: https://github.com/crablang/crab/issues/6 I...

What if this was done with a macro? ```rust let some_var = ?!(some_condition ? "true" : "false"); ```

> There is already `let i = if b {"Yes"} else {"No"};` And it would literally just expand to this

> What about making something like > > ```shell > crabgo convert rs crab > ``` > > which would mean rs => crab and > > ```shell > crabgo...