Tiago de Carvalho Miranda

@prdn thanks for your answer! So, if workers are connected to the "handlers broker" as clients, you would agree to allow them to "communicate" by messages without a separate layer...

Would help me as well. As you just said, i'm doing it manually with a requests interface.

Seems like zeromq is not meant to provide this kind of security, right?

The message could contain the data necessary to reply to the client.

In this case, all clients must always be connected to all brokers, right? Is it bad?

I can't see much where to fit some plugins pattern, maybe emitting some events to the worker and the client, so it would be easy and possible to take actions...

@a3s yes, but I don't thing anyone had the chance to look into it yet. I think the first step would be to test the current implementation against the new...

Hi @guyellis, seems that we cannot augment non-exported interfaces within namespaces (which is the third example on the link you shared) right? We need to access (at least) the schema's...

I think that import and then export in another module wont work. Because we need to augment the original interface. My guess is that if we export the interface inside...

@guyellis I opened a branch https://github.com/TCMiranda/joi-extract-type/tree/feature/joi16 to work on it. I managed to make some stuff work. To use it you need to manually patch @types/hapi__joi declaration file like so:...