Stefan Bertels

I know this is an old issue entry but I'm looking for a solution to pre-define arbitraries for my own types (and could not find anything for that within docs...

Thanks for your answer. Ok, I see the point of the extra package (which probably is worth going this way). For problem 2 (resolving): Generally I don't like "automagic" and...

https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn-analyzers/issues/5685 https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/34098

Seems that \u0000 fails on all targets.

Found the cause: Default comparer for strings is quite different from "Ordinal" if unicode characters are used (starting with net5.0). https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/base-types/string-comparison-net-5-plus I fixed the tests and everything looks good. Maybe...

Closing is fine. Opened #1144 for a related bug.

Related question: If you plan for [Record] code generation, then maybe allow building [Union] types based on [Record] types (which might open some options for extensibility). I don't have a...

Sounds good. Regarding ShowCircle: Could this be an option later for built-in data types, too? Like solving #593 by creating some `ShowHashMapStringInt : Show`. Another idea: Could `Show` classes support...

At least you can store `Exception` within `Error` and use `Exception.Data` as dictionary... 🙄 Of source this is not a good solution (a lot of type-unsafety etc) but we should...

Just my 2 pence: I like the library features for `Option` especially things like LINQ support (`bind`). C# 8 will make nullables safer but I personally think that I want...