Stef Heyenrath
Stef Heyenrath
@Kielek Could you check it?
@serber Note that it's already possible to provide the json serializer here: https://github.com/wiremock/WireMock.Net/blob/master/src/WireMock.Net.Minimal/ResponseBuilders/Response.WithBody.cs#L217 Or do you mean something else?
Normally you would install WireMock.Net in a unit test project. And I do not understand how adding WireMock.Net breaks / changes the json serializer used. Can you please provide a...
@tavisca-mjadhav Did you try this? > It's already possible to provide the json serializer here: https://github.com/wiremock/WireMock.Net/blob/master/src/WireMock.Net.Minimal/ResponseBuilders/Response.WithBody.cs#L217
@tavisca-mjadhav I see your point. ~Maybe a solution for this would be that the proxy recording does not try to parse/write json, but just the string or just even the...
@tavisca-mjadhav A better solution would be that the JSON (de)-serialization from the mapping files is configurable between newtonsoft and systemtext. I'll take a look.
This makes sense. I did change this. However when opening a SidePanel, I got this error: `sidePanel.open() may only be called in response to a user gesture.` I guess it...
1] Context Menu click to open a tab or do something else will work correct. 2] However, opening a side-panel generates this error: ``` Error: `sidePanel.open()` may only be called...
Translating the whole Background worker to JavaScript is very difficult I guess. Maybe add functionality to be able to insert custom javascript-code as the first code in the generated background.js...
> Maybe add functionality to be able to insert custom javascript-code as the first code in the generated background.js ? What I mean by this is just make it possible...