Stef Heyenrath

@ibrar434 It could be that there were some changes, however it's difficult for me to understand you issue. Can you please share the full example code and that matcher code...

@ibrar434 It could be that there were some changes, however it's difficult for me to understand you issue. Can you please share the full example code and that matcher code...

@ibrar434 It could be that there were some changes, however it's difficult for me to understand you issue. Can you please share the full example code and that matcher code...

You can take a look here:: - https://github.com/wiremock/WireMock.Net/wiki/Request-Matching-GraphQLMatcher - https://github.com/wiremock/WireMock.Net/blob/master/test/WireMock.Net.Tests/Matchers/GraphQLMatcherTests.cs - https://github.com/wiremock/WireMock.Net/blob/master/test/WireMock.Net.Tests/RequestMatchers/RequestMessageGraphQLMatcherTests.cs

I see your point, and I must admin the functionality is hard to understand, and not all is implemented, and the examples are not complete. However I did update the...

See also https://github.com/wiremock/WireMock.Net/pull/1335

@BrunoBeraud I need to check.

@BrunoBeraud I did check the code and it's correct, in my unit tests I need to pass that text (including Content-Type as part of the body) to get a valid...

@BrunoBeraud I did not test the Docker image, but just local code. And the mapping in json is like: ``` json { "Guid": "b9c82182-e469-41da-bcaf-b6e3157fefdb", "UpdatedAt": "2025-12-18T17:21:57.3879723Z", "Request": { "Path": {...

My plan is indeed to drop a lot of framework support. Can you check this PR? https://github.com/wiremock/WireMock.Net/pull/1359 And validate if this could solve this issue?