Derk-Jan Karrenbeld

@kamilogorek I doubt this is fixed given all the posts above and no associated commit.

You're right. That link no longer exists. Just for my information: For which track were you trying to do this?

Nice. I want this too 🙃🥺😁❤️

Yes, this sounds right.

Hi there and thank you for your contribution. These changes should be proposed in https://github.com/exercism/problem-specifications first, and afterwards it can be synced here :)

> Exercism already has comprehensive language tracks, we almost need concept tracks separated out. E.g. object orientation, functional, reactive, declarative, duck-typing, etc. Yes. This is one of the ideas we...

> I have seen some people make the argument that curly-braces blocks are for return values and do/end is for side effects, but for beginners I usually favor consistency over...

Can you give us the code that passed the tests before and does not with this change?

Yep. Your investigation is correct. - Downgrade chalk please - The ESM/CommonJS shit is a hot topic. If you check the Chalk repository, you'll see ;) - I'll also figure...

It's one of the things where I just hack around it too. I have a few projects with esm-only packages, so we can likely copy that configuration to make things...