Derk-Jan Karrenbeld
Derk-Jan Karrenbeld
That's a good case. Ok. I agree with your assessment :)
Whilst the comment change is a good one @Steffe-Dev, we are no longer generating comments _for mentors_, and everything is done directly on solutions. So instead, detecting the code @joshgoebel...
It should be suppressed. So your options are: - Does it use an object? - If yes, but defined inside, please hoist - If yes, and defined outside, all good...
@Steffe-Dev if you need any more help or pointers, ping me here or on [the Exercism Discord](https://discord.gg/ktxCW2Cx)
Yah sounds fine with me! You could also check if the TS analyzer has a better base here with less intertwining
All good. We manually reopen it if there's merit. Which there is!!!
@Steffe-Dev is there now another change necessary?
No problemo. Thank you for working on the first part!
This is included, but I think this might be recognised already because of the ternary. Do you have a solution id? (URL has it).
Thank you for providing that (it allows me to do two things: find the current message, and run this example through an offline analyzer). Personally I'm on the fence of...