Thomas Silkjær

Thanks for reporting this. I am all for removing the flag. As the current design will just limit the IOUs in which the trades can be made, based on the...

> point to note, if we removed the IOU capability and didn’t allow issued tokens to function on the XLS20 amendment, we’d not only be removing choice for how users...

> Hi Guys, Why not use pathfinding or Rippling to change the transfer fees to XRP once someone pays with a token that they don't own or completely just do...

> If the secondary sale is done using a XLS14D NFT the transfer fee is not payed as the 14D NFT can not be divided. It can be argued whether...

> I don't think dropping the flag is a good option rather I suggest to add in a separate field that is mandatory when the flag is on. > >...

Just to make it clear, the Trustline flag does not define whether a token can be traded with IOUs or not. The OnlyXRP flag does that. The Trustline flag enables...

> Now I see it your point makes sense but didn't understood the "whitelist" thing maybe I'm missing something If the issuer has set 10 different trustlines on her account,...

> That solves it! 🙂 Great, that's the existing design without the flag 😉

The forensics API (both case reporting and serving) is still hosted by xrplorer at this moment, but is generally absorbed by the XRPLF. The API was used by several explorers...

I believe increased transparency will foster more lobbying and validator pressure. Why is it anyone's business how validators choose to conduct their business? Unless it's an adoption criteria metric by...