Wang Yuan

To be honest, this is the first time to see this usage. I study your PR and https://abseil.io/docs/cpp/guides/status, i find it truly satisfies my requirement that i want to return...

it is limited, in transaction, there also are some reading operations, we also hope we can read committed writing operations, maybe you can implement searching WAL(rocksdb supports it) to support...

but if you don't commit write(pending in `txn_write_batch`), you can't Read-Your-Own-Write in normal mode.

> RocksDB also supports the WriteBatchWithIndex to implement the Read-Your-Own-Write feature, but it needs to involve all read operations, so I didn't plan to do it in the current stage...

you shouldn't ask developers not have Read-Your-Own-Write operations in transactions, ``` set a b multi set a c get a // if you don't commit write batch, you will get...

Hi @tisonkun i think we can close it, kvrocks has supported slot-based data migration, and kvrocks controller already can be used. Thanks for your attention.

The proxy distribute clients' requests to redis node by calculating the `slot` of `key` in the requests. But the position of `key` in a request is uncertain for different module...

> One idea, we add some module command items in config file. For one module command, it marks command name, first key, last key, key numbers, read/write and so on....

Hi @lakano You could do some tests https://github.com/RedisLabs/redis-cluster-proxy/pull/65

Yes, it has been a quite long time that no commit for these repo. I hope we can push it forward. Thanks for @artix75 As I know, this proxy really...