Antonio Salazar Cardozo

Closing in favor of #3281.

This is correct behavior! But perhaps not *clear* behavior. The transfer screen is meant to show you who you're sending the GTC to (the *token recipient*). The Ledger screen shows...

Ah, if ledger is interpreting the ERC20 interaction rather than showing raw contract info then we may well be displaying the wrong thing here, and that would be a bug.

It looks like the To displayed on the ledger matches what our UI shows in those screenshots/photos. That is correct behavior. We do need to adapt the other fields to...

Ahh I see! I anchored hard to the initial screenshots in the description and misunderstood here, sorry. Yeah, so to display the ERC20 recipient on the Ledger, I believe we...

Haven't had a chance to chime in here, but: concept is sound, current implementation duplicates a bunch of stuff. I would focus on reusable workflows connected to each other rather...

This isn't top of mind right now, so closing the PR for the time being while noting it for reference if and when we want to circle back to this...

Hey folks, I wanted to poke at what is now #3385 before going deep on review here. Now that 3385 is written up, I'm going to try and give this...

Going to close this out for the time being. It's not top of mind, we didn't reach clear actionable guidance here, and the bigger pain points after discussing with the...

In addition to manifest v3 not being top of mind right now, it's not entirely clear to me why this wouldn't trigger the issues we originally inlined the script to...