CRob

We discussed today in the BEST WG. The group was positive on the suggestion. David W. was going to explore more. Thanks for sharing!

I like it Cheers, CRob Director of Security Communications Intel Product Assurance and Security Book time with Robinson, Christopher ***@***.***?anonymous&ep=pcard> From: David A. Wheeler ***@***.***> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2024...

Thanks Kurt, I'll check it out and update the doc!

TI Support Reference This is the suggested approach to prioritize staff involvement in foundation efforts. Moving from most engaged to less engaged... 1. Board Committees/Councils 2. Working Groups 3. Projects...

> @SecurityCRob did we also confirm that SWAG is for projects at Sandbox+ ? According to https://github.com/ossf/tac/blob/main/process/TI-Gives%2BGets.md#getsbenefits, Sandbox was not written up as eligible for custom swag. At Incubating we...

> hey @sevansdell and @SecurityCRob, there are three separate statements here which I'd like to reconcile. > > 1. @SecurityCRob has prioritized the existing PMO tasks by TI maturity (the...

> > Since this is a Content PR, we might want to add a CHANGELOG file in this PR to start following the [TAC decision process](https://github.com/ossf/tac/blob/main/process/TAC-Decision-Process.md#pull-request-types)? > > Sounds good...

The TAC is here to help manage reputational and technical risk for the foundation (The "T" and "A" of our name [Technical Advisory Council]). Approximately two years ago the Governing...

TAC & MAC are now included in all blog efforts and each group is given opportunity to provide feedback as a native part of the process now. thanks!

Is this issue still needed? Can we close and open new issues for any future issues?