Sebastian Günther

Hi Alejandro, I already saw your issue at Elmer repo. Thanks for noticing. Do you have any idea when they will update their binaries? Do you compile yours yourself? Best,...

So we should not rely on this Elmer fix. I'm also not keen on compiling :-)

Hello, I haven't reviewed this PR in its actual context but found some kind of general issue, i.e. 'LossModelMagnet.comp_loss' refer to specific geometries (HoleMx, ...) to get magnet width and...

Hello @BonneelP I will check the PR the next days. Best Regards, Sebastian

Hello @BonneelP finally I got some time to review this PR. The PR will be a great addtion to pyleecan. Moving to a dict for models simplifies loss simulation setup...

... I haven't checked the single models for now. Is there a test to check all possible periodicities in space and time?

Hello Pierre, a name proposal from my side is LossModelwindagePyrhonen. But you can also keep the actual name and all other windage models will have an addtional identifier. Maybe we...

Hello Pierre, I was affraid of such answer :-) So mag.internal is indeed no place to store my data. But there should be a way to store data that are...

Hello babdwahab, for the rotor you try to model, you should setup a interior magnet machine (MachineIPMSM) with HoleM50 rotor.  Best regards, Sebastian

Hello Kevin, your proposal is reasonable in my opinion. Depending on your actual needs, you may also try to use yoke notches (PR #376). Do you need the frame and/or...