Paul Schmidt

Sure, but note I am talking about beautifying **comments**, not tables: Here is a sample: ``` r # This is my dash-dash word. And this right here is inline code...

Sorry to bother you, but any news about this? I am still re-inserting all the dashes after beautifying my comments 😅

Thanks for taking the time! So, the example from above works perfectly fine. However, I then tried this one here: ```r #' Bzgl. der Behandlungseffekte ist der Versuch prinzipiell 3...

Yes, I tried out several comments and I think we can close this issue now. Thanks a lot!

Hey, somehow I stumbled across a case where it still doesn't work right? **Before** ``` r #' Sidenote: One can also use the `dispformula = ~ 0` argument to set...

Well I'd be happy with an `include_reference_level` argument that leads to all blanks and no 0s, too. (I just found 0s to be intuitive when teaching and I am used...

I found that {broom.helpers} does what I was looking for and {ggally} is making use of that, too: ``` r library(dplyr) m % select(term, contrasts:conf.high) #> # A tibble: 3...

Great, thanks! The implementation in {altR2} ([permalink to GitHub code line](https://github.com/karchjd/altR2/blob/63ab6cc9bbaf818e5465de476d99fc9356b4b2d3/R/altR2.R#L121)) seems relatively straightforward to me.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but in my reprex it is not strictly true that all parameters (fixed **and** random!) of `mod.rb` are also in `mod.fb`? Below is an analogous,...

Alright, thanks. The reason I noticed this in the first place is rather underwhelming: I was playing around with `performance::compare_performance()` and `performance::test_performance()` to compare models just like those in the...