Colin Leister
Colin Leister
Hi Scott, thanks for the reply! Your points are valid and well known. Even when the number of clusters in 3.0 can exceed 32K, we still have to consider the...
Hi Scott, Here was my idea. Let's say we define a top-level class called _Customer_ that has a schema defined on it that will be used across all customers. We'd...
The three problems with using clusters is that we don't currently support creating indices per cluster, you lose polymorphism, and you're losing the benefit of distributing load across multiple clusters...
Another cool benefit of a namespace is that we could more easily define for the distributed system where the namespace data resides without having to go down to the cluster...
I think I know what you mean, but mind providing an example?
I haven't given that a lot of thought, but I see no reason why it couldn't, especially if we need to define indices on that class per namespace. I think...
Hi @a-unite. Thanks for the comments! Good suggestions. Many months ago, Luigi and I had discussed something similar to your "pin namespace" comment. I think we'd come up with something...
Hi @a-unite. I agree with everything you said. We'll definitely have to sort out the use of credentials for each namespace. Thanks, again. -Colin
Hi Scott, Not bad ideas, and I agree that we want to reuse as much existing "standard stuff" as possible to save time, reduce incompatibilities, etc. I think with namespaces,...
Great explanation.