Ryan Zimmerman

@oscarotero I've thought about this myself, but never proposed it. Adding it would almost certainly be a breaking change though, since it could create variable name collisions with existing templates....

@oscarotero That's a possible solution, in fact I kind of like it. @mde will have the final decision, though.

See https://github.com/mde/ejs/pull/251 for discussion; I'm not going to merge anything on this front without permission from the other maintainers.

I suppose that would be nice, but I can't think of a sane way to do it (unless you can). For now, your best option is to use an html...

I'll let @mde & @TimothyGu decide if this is something to implement.

BTW, you could also write your own function, like this: ``` 0){ for(var i=0;i ``` Then you could do something like `` if you wanted the include to be indented...

@mde thoughts?

> it should be supported by the library Unless @mde disagrees, we would be open to a PR. It would be best to expose this functionality behind a flag IMO....

@canastro Care to contribute?

@sitegui, are you interested in working on this? Otherwise, I'll add a `help wanted` label.