Ruben Verborgh
Ruben Verborgh
> > RFC 6906 does not define a profile at the moment, and the text is > > compatible with the notion of a profile I propose (and I'm happy...
> why are we trying to tell him what "profile" means? I wasn't—just trying to understand :smile: Conclusion so far: we apparently mean something different, even though 6906 doesn't state...
> the latest commits should be pretty clear. Truth is, you never know whether a text is clear until you ask others. Given that there are still no exact definitions,...
Cool, thanks! Long live the magic number 100—also a default TPF page size.
Makes me think of the Bucket Algorithm by Levy et al., where you also consider other constraints instead of only relations.
Proposed solution is right; currently, it selects all keys in the file, does not filter webid.
Indeed; we can also just string manipulate the query.
These are very important questions to raise. My preliminary view on some answers is in https://ruben.verborgh.org/blog/2019/06/17/shaping-linked-data-apps/, but other approaches exist.
As a co-author of the IETF draft, I think the main thing is the following. The draft stops at the point that profiles are identified by URIs. It does not...
> Should the data that describes these options be standardized somehow, so that various clients can present them to the users? Yes, IMHO. Was also @timbl's suggestion. Even created a...