Ruben Verborgh
Ruben Verborgh
> I recommend closing this issue with the understanding that Solid Protocol is clear about the requirements. I'm afraid I disagree upon looking more closely. I find in the spec:...
Yes, but which resolvers, and how will this work in the browser? I’m all for DID, but what is the subset implementers MUST support? That is _the_ issue.
> then add support for others as time/resources/usecase permits But it’s not about our resources though. It’s about what we put as a MUST in the spec. Only those DID...
> The `method-specific-id` value MUST be able to be generated without the use of a centralized registry service. I don't see an objection in the way that it is currently...
Currently covered by WAC-Allow. (Not saying it’s the best option though.)
Thanks, @POBrien333. Here is a diff from `ieee` to `ieee-with-url`: https://gist.github.com/RubenVerborgh/1a365b50d8da8ef263ca942310f7bcb9#file-ieee-diff My comments are: - 68–69: This might be where `ieee` incorrectly drops the "in…" for conference proceedings - 77–132:...
Well that's the main one I noticed, yes.
I have a different pipeline (BibTeX) than yours, but my issue was that ```bibtex @inproceedings{verborgh_usewod_2015, author = {Verborgh, Ruben and Mannens, Erik and Van de Walle, Rik}, title = {Initial...
@elf-pavlik Thanks! Could you detail/specify "reliable" in your comment above?
@gibsonf1 Is that a future or current implementation (do you have pointers)?