RockScience

Is it better now?

I was right to be scared of your answer ;) My code is in R, not c++? Thanks for your wise suggestions. I agree this tryCatch is not nice, Hence...

This is what I need to do to avoid getting any error from Rblpapi ``` r data = tryCatch({Rblpapi::bdp(securities = securities, fields = fields, con = con, options = NULL,...

That is quite an issue for a "fault tolerant" scheduler. Is there someone looking into that?

Insertion is not an issue because there is a native batch insert that works fine. However updating is more tricky because you have to update the documents one by one....

Thanks, indeed it is related. However, my guess is that the fix for these 2 issues (Issue #14 and Issue #19) are different: (just my guess as I have looked...

I suspect line 64 of RMongo / src / r-mongo-scala / src / main / scala / rmongo / RMongo.scala is not parsing correctly arrays of documents: 64: JSON.parse(query).asInstanceOf[DBObject]

Any progress on this? Being able to send arrays of documents without a loop is a native feature of mongodb API which is very important for a scripting language like...

I have to say, this is a core feature that would be very useful. In practice it is not reasonable/professional to delete and insert back

How difficult is it to provide in your package RMongo with a simple wrapper of the java API collection.update() ? As you have already the structure to call the java...