Ricky

This can probably be closed now, no longer seeing this issue on v0.9.52

Okay, this implementation I'm actually happy with I used the [Wayback Machine](https://web.archive.org/web/20240205010658/https://gitpython.readthedocs.io/en/stable/reference.html#module-git.repo.fun) & [GitHub](https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/blob/64ec0b1f86ada5565e30bc21b4ad189c6c4df49e/git/repo/fun.py) to get the actual documentation / source code for GitPython I changed the test for "is...

Apologies for breaking your workflow! Could we perhaps detect that we're running in the web environment and skip the check, as a middle-ground solution? Not sure how possible that is...

@simoncozens unsure if the issue here lies in the check code, or in your beziers library, but if you'd be able to take a look, I'd really appreciate it! The...

Anything breaking in the API, or am I safe to PR for this repo moving to 0.6? We're pinned on 0.5.x currently https://github.com/fonttools/fontbakery/blob/95d1c4f6f733c2cff6aeac147518f621b6c8fa53/pyproject.toml#L44

Okay, looking at the `builder2` branch: > 'instances' no longer supported; generate a config with --generate and select the instances you want So now I can't specify my own instances?...

Thanks Simon, sorry for the hassle! There's no urgency here as we're going to re-use a handrolled approach we know works while we wait for builder2 to stabilise (before hopefully...

That's my understanding, yes. You can't request just some of your config-defined outputs for a particular build. That's mostly orthogonal to this issue though

To fix this in diffenator2, the `youdeesee` dependency needs to be updated to at least v0.5.0 (from ^0.3.0) Unfortunately, trying this locally meant all the functional tests failed. Not sure...

> I'd rather "repo" be the repo slug and a new optional "ref" field be added Sure, I can do that. Or we could do pip-like syntax and have repo...