RichardTaylor
RichardTaylor
Agree replacement for the word "extraneous" for use when we remove extraneous material from the site
To make our service more accessible we want to use a simpler word, or phrase, than extraneous to describe material removed on the grounds it isn't a necessary part of...
WhatDoTheyKnow lists coroner's offices: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/body/list/coroners_office We could usefully note: >Records of inquest should be available on request. [The Chief Coroner's guidance](https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/guidance-no-17-conclusions.pdf) states: >"The Record should normally be treated as a...
We sometimes want to add an annotation in the interests of running the service transparently, but don't want to draw undue attention to an issue. Adding an annotation "quietly" has...
On WhatDoTheyKnow administrators from time to time upload files under http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/files/ eg. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/details_of_meeting_on_the_regula#comment-1648 This is not currently done via the admin interface; it would be useful if it was so...
eg. at https://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/11812/nick_clegg/sheffield%2C_hallam/recent votes from 2017 are described as recent. Options: * Switch the word "recent" for "latest". * Stop showing "recent votes" for those who left their roles years...
Currently TheyWorkForyou states, for example: >On 31 Oct 2019: Rory Stewart was absent for a vote on Draft Representation of the People (Annual Canvass) (Amendment) Regulations 2019 — Data Matching...
Next to a line on an MP or MP's votes page like: "Voted very strongly for a wholly elected House of Lords" show how many of our users from the...
One of the recommendations of the [MPs’ Outside Interests report by the Committee on Standards in Public Life in July 2018](https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/721697/CSPL_MPs__outside_interests_-_full_report.PDF) was: >The Parliamentary Digital Service should develop and implement...
Following the closure of #3074 this is a new ticket for improving the censor rule created on the automated anonomising and closing of an account. The issue is a censor...
We might want to use the term "unlisted", or "accessible only with the link", or have text like: >This request is excluded from search results on [site name] ([details](https://github.com/mysociety/whatdotheyknow-theme/issues/767)) linking...