Rhys Ulerich

Agreed @roystgnr. Sorry for the noise. Still, rather than macroing around things, I'll soapbox one last time that it feels weird if that sort of macro produces an appreciable change....

Ah. That no-RTTI mode makes sense. Soapboxing withdrawn.

I'd personally follow Boost's lead as much as possible since that more or less hit as standard in C++11.

Thank you @sternj, that's a lot of nice context. @daniel-shields, would a `--cpu-only --flamegraph`-like option have given you the sort of information that you wanted for your use case? Given...

+1. `z -h` would be more useful to new folks.

Thank you for reporting this errata. The original content felt odd from a language perspective and some experimentation in Python 3.8.1 showed a confusing result.

+1