Razvan Nitu
Razvan Nitu
> do an experiment nevertheless and be pragmatic and see if I can get something reliable working that cuts down on CI loads at work. @nordlow do you have any...
>I think this is a great usecase for dmd as a library, what do you think @RazvanN7 ? > I don't follow this, are you saying this should be a...
@RubyTheRoobster maybe a rebase will fix the failing buildkite test.
Unfortunately, it's probably related since now you are probably ending up with multiple template instances that might overlap with existing non-template function declarations... urgh...
> Have you try to add a supplemental access check on the fd used by a CallExp (and if the CallExp has no other errors) ? Yes, the problem is...
@Geod24 I agree, but last time I checked that requires a major re-engineering of the entire alias implementation.
Well, having private and public functions in the same overload set is arguably something that should be avoided. The fix is quite trivial: just keep your private functions in a...
@Geod24 Keep in mind that this solution was not my idea. It does make sense to not have public and private functions in the same overload set, but I have...
I think that we should stop considering that @nogc code is synonymous to 'extremely fast code' (and randomly add restrictions like "no allocations" to its meaning on that basis). You...
> to the point where I would advocate removing it from the language entirely Music to my ears.