Andrew Randrianasulu

I haven't tried personally running ELKS in pcem or 86box, but they both provide more accurate cpu timing or even hdd timing (in 86box git) emulation ..

[bug.log](https://github.com/termux/termux-packages/files/9179819/bug.log) Sorry about formatting in original entry, I have no idea now to reliably copy/paste long outputs. Sometimes it works, sometimes not.

@licy183 this is exactly my current course of action - patch ffmpeg sources with #undef B0. But at least on ffmpeg dev thinks I should prevent inclusion of this file...

I have this in my proot scripts on Android 10: ``` $ cat proot.sh #!/bin/sh unset LD_PRELOAD proot -r deb_11 -0 -b /sys -b /proc -b /dev -b /system -b...

digging into old feature requests via google I found link to this project: https://sourceforge.net/p/fudf/news/2008/07/fudf-v20-released/ description says: "version 2.0 supports creation, reading and editing of UDF2.50 compliant filesystems." But.. not sure...

so, I compiled udfclient 0.8.11 (with small edit in uio. h due to conflicting iovec define.. on termux/android, arm 32 bit system). next I booted netbsd 9.2 boot iso (200mb)...

also there was mkudfiso from 2010 on sourceforge, but it only makes udf 1.02? from my download manager: https://phoenixnap.dl.sourceforge.net/project/blurayauthor/mkudfiso/mkudfiso-svn-checkout/mkudfiso-svn-checkout-20100208.tar.gz also there is 'our' bdwrite, but it probably does not do...

On Tuesday, November 23, 2021, pali ***@***.***> wrote: > If you want to add support for UDF 2.50+ into mkudffs for non-VAT images, > then I think it is required...

some more links [https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/26257714/all-approved-udf-260-dcns](udf 2.60 errata? ) - talks about BD-R requrements and how (dcn-5102) Metadata Bitmap file shall not be recorded for read-only media.. [https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8832031/udf-filesystem-reading-bluray-metadata-partition-libdvdread-with-iso-images](stackowerflow question dealing with analysis...

On Thursday, November 25, 2021, pali ***@***.***> wrote: > Just to note that udfinfo has already support for reading/parsing metadata > partition and metadata file. > ah, thanks. Sorry, official...