Benjamin Saunders
Benjamin Saunders
> So please don't drop it or even mark it as obsolete If it's useful to you, you can always vendor it -- Quinn congestion controllers don't need to be...
> I would prefer to just detect truncation and write code once to automatically increase buffer sizes as necessary so that I don't have to think about this. This will...
> However, I should be passing to it a number of buffers equal to the batch size for GRO or GSO, and it should always put one packet per buffer...
`ServerSession` could expose a method to invoke retries of pending operations in `StoresServerSessions` and perhaps elsewhere. You'd still need some way for the application to associate a `get` request with...
It's up to @est31, I'm afraid.
Given the API design challenges you identified, I'm not sure the implementation is complex enough relative to the API for there to be much benefit providing a helper for this...
Note that our CI already covers several non-Linux unix cases, which work just fine.
Good catch, thanks! I think your proposed solution makes sense.
In `quinn-proto/tests/mod.rs`, there's a number of tests that manipulate `Pair::mtu`. Something similar could work here; queue a bunch of large datagrams, drop the MTU, and ensure that some are still...
Sounds like the dot product needs to be clamped.