Rafael DeJesus

I agree the using the word concurrency adds confusion. What about something along the lines of `carryoverIntervalCount`, `carryoverPendingIntoNextInterval` or `applyPendingToNextIntervalCap`? Or we could rename `intervalCap` to `intervalLimit` and have `applyPendingToNextIntervalLimit`

Interesting. Just adding that 1 test causes failures in multiple other tests. Before: ``` 39 tests passed 2 known failures ``` After: ``` 5 tests failed 2 known failures ```...

@thejamespower, I think `intervalCap` is still being respected. I think that what is happening is at a larger number of tasks, the `await`ing no longer sufficient to meet the time...