Ingvar Stepanyan
Ingvar Stepanyan
I agree that answer is "no" in general to most of these questions. If we ever have enough people and interest to tackle problem of CST again, we could create...
Sounds good. Just few clarifications: > 1. define logic of `range` and `loc` Just the general logic, not the actual properties, right? We can still define the properties under (3)...
Yeah, I think a good example here would be something like `ExpressionStatement` where `;` is outside of what is directly covered by properties, but logically still covered by the node...
Yeah I think only steps 6-8 are necessary.
My concern with tracking proposals separately is in increased maintenance burden cost with low / unknown value. There's usually way more proposals in general than those that make it beyond...
> As another example, if I had missed a memo and didn't hear that a feature had moved to stage 4 and merged into the main spec, then I'd likely...
It's rather hard to understand which of the conversations here are still unresolved. Is there anything left?
Sounds like duplicate of https://github.com/estree/estree/pull/161
I agree, it's just that neither of proposed PRs currently fixes it correctly - in both cases, you end up with either breaking correct representation or duplicating same lists of...
I think it would be still the best to keep extension specs in separate repos under corresponding owners, otherwise we might end with maintaining a lot of JS dialects in...