Luis Hebendanz

Wow that's handy! I think I will add it. Or if you have already done so feel free to make a branch and then a pull request

Maybe try using this video as reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnpC_Ib_lbc

Yeeeeah... I think I will skip on using IncludeOS. I am following this blog https://os.phil-opp.com on how to implement your own x64 kernel in Rust I think that's the better...

Cool, thanks for your work! I would still really recommend to follow the blog, I have a working kernel right now and soon with async support plus you learn so...

If someone wants to open up a new reworked pull request go ahead :-) I sadly won't be able to work on this for at least a couple of months...

> Thanks a lot for the PR! I did not have time to review the MTRR code (it's a lot), but I left some comments on the other changes. >...

> Out of curiosity, is there a reason that you're using MTTRs instead of the PAT? This seems like a lot of code for something that has already been superseded....

> > The problem is that MTTRs are still relevant in x64 and active and can override PAT. Which means it's very important to know how they are configured by...

@Freax13 Ah very nice! I must admit I didn't look too closely into the table because I just assumed that a different effective caching behavior then what the developer thought...

If someone wants to open up a new reworked pull request go ahead :-) I sadly won't be able to work on this for at least a couple of months...