Shiyu Qiu

When I run with the option `'-Xjit:{Test.n(*)*}(optLevel=hot,lastOptIndex=137,optDetails,log=issue18955.log)'`, the log file indicates that the `optIndex` corresponds to `localCSE`. ```log Performing 137: localCSE [ 387] 137.1 O^O LOCAL COMMON SUBEXPRESSION ELIMINATION: Local...

Hello, I found mis-compilation again in the localCSE optimization but using another testcase. To avoid cluttering the issue system, I'll post the relevant information here. Could you please confirm if...

Hello, I recently received a new test case. It is similar to the original test case in this issue, in that it can produce the correct results when the `-Xjit:optLevel=hot,disablePRE`...

I understand now. Thank you for your explanation. @hzongaro

In this environment, bugs can still be triggered fairly reliably. ```bash $ openj9-openjdk-jdk8/.../java -version openjdk version "1.8.0_412-internal" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_412-internal-user_2024_03_06_10_45-b00) Eclipse OpenJ9 VM (build master-8c1d42dad, JRE 1.8.0 Linux...

When running with the `-Xjit:{Test.h(*)*}(optLevel=hot)` option, an incorrect result occurs approximately once in every five runs.

Thanks for your confirm. I have another bug testcase here that seems to be related to `generalStoreSinking` (may dup of #17033 ). I hope this testcase can be of help...

I have another bug testcase here that seems to be related to generalStoreSinking (may dup of https://github.com/eclipse-openj9/openj9/issues/17033 ). I hope this testcase can be of help to you. Is there...