PunkPangolin

Building for the pre-release repository sounds great! I would also be glad to help you test.

> CLI tools are not a proper use case for flathub. To be honest, I wasn't sure about that, is that a hard criterion? As a user of an immutable...

> > The domain used for the application ID is [controlled by the application developer(s)](https://docs.flathub.org/docs/for-app-authors/requirements/#control-over-domain-or-repository) and the [application id guidelines](https://docs.flathub.org/docs/for-app-authors/requirements#application-id) are followed. > > But the domain isn't responding. ocrmypdf.io...

Thank you for the prompt response! I am glad I can finally do something to support OCRmyPDF. Then I would use `io.ocrmypdf.ocrmypdf` as application ID and `io.ocrmypdf` as author ID...

Yes, I am also willing to be listed as a maintainer and would be happy to assist the project in this way. I think the only helpful upstream change would...

I made a PR for submission to Flathub [here](https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/6035. The flaws regarding manifest and metadata should be sorted out (hopefully). Now only the verification of domain ownership remains. For that,...

The flatpak build already includes `leptonica`, but `--remove-background` not working cannot be fixed by packaging, as it is no longer implemented by upstream ([see here](https://github.com/ocrmypdf/OCRmyPDF/issues/1412)).

@jbarlow83 (sorry for ping) The PR for Flathub is ready to be merged, only the website verification remains. Could you take care of this?

@jbarlow83 Sorry for pinging you again, but if you have a moment, could you set up the website redirection? It's the only thing preventing the Flathub submission right now.

Alternatively we could also use `io.github.ocrmypdf.ocrmypdf`, which could also maybe simplify [verification of the app on Flathub](https://docs.flathub.org/docs/for-app-authors/verification).