Keags

Forgive me if I'm missing something, but this doesn't seem like a protocol change so much as a policy recommendation? The only thing I can imagine leaking into the protocol...

ACK [682fd8b](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1522/commits/682fd8bc588df7d71476420f7bc9ed1cbacabd05)

The effort to add an explicit resume message is being abandoned after the discussion taking place [here](https://github.com/rustyrussell/lightning-rfc/pull/14). The core observation is that it increases the number of situations where we...

> Weighing in late here, but is it worth adding an advisory note about disconnecting to exit quiescence if you need to resolve a HTLC to prevent a force close?...

> I would consider it a strict improvement if BIP editors had permission to merge non-meaning changing PRs to BIPs. Permitted should be to fix a typo or a broken...

NACK This would result in a backwards incompatible change and revising this spec may cause funds to be rendered impossible to find. Perhaps instead the optimization is added as a...

To keep the project focused, this is the list of the design goals in order of priority. With my current understanding of the problem set, it seems like it is...

> Is it technically possible to change a pre-taproot channel to taproot one without spending the channel point UTXO? Fundamentally what is required is being able to spend the legacy...

> I don't really see this as a grieving vector as it just terminates after a single road In a world where we don't have a revocation for the kickoff...

I took a break from working out these details to finish up my first draft of the actual proposal language. That work can be tracked [here](https://github.com/ProofOfKeags/bolts/blob/extension/dynamic-commitments/ext-dynamic-commitments.md)