Tuan Amith, PhD

We apologize for the oversight. Changes have been made to address the conflict with the identifier.

Hi @matentzn, thank you for the response. Yes we are still interested in being accepted in OBO Foundry. We made some adjustments to the ontology to address the flags raised...

> Yes you are right, thank you @cthoyt, this is a requirement by the [Versioning Principle](https://obofoundry.org/principles/fp-004-versioning.html) - Dashboard does not currently check for this. Made an [issue](https://github.com/OBOFoundry/OBO-Dashboard/issues/67). @UTH-Tuan a human...

@shawntanzk Thanks for the initial feedback. We can address most of these within the next day or two with an updated version if that's ok.

@shawntanzk, we have released an updated version that addresses some of the initial feedback (redefined "graph", assigned proper iri, definitions, etc). If by any chance there is a need for...

Hi @shawntanzk, I am in the midst of addressing your points including a description of the use case. I will have a response by later this week.

I apologize for the delay. We may need extra week due to scheduling to add the changes to artifact.

Sorry for the late response. This fell off my radar.

>The changes made to ID as http://sbmi.uth.edu/ontology/mcro#mcro_XXXXXX is also a good step - though I would recommend using 7 digits instead of 6 to be more conformant to OBO ontologies...

@shawntanzk and @matentzn We want to acknowledge your response and thank you for the inclusion of our work into OBO. We have a paper (software) that we were waiting on...