Kjeld Schouten

> Agree with @joepie91. > > Especially the "tell us all domains you own" is proabably 100% bs. (though IANAL). > > All that aside, is anyone surprised? Of course...

> Aside from the list of demands being harsh, hypocritical, and unreasonable, in the end, if the claims are true, it sounds like Barinsta did violate FB's ToS. A ToS...

@alexander-akait Do you have exaples of using SWC and SWC minifier instead of babel?

Github already has auto labeling issues buildin for a while now.

> This would be really a killing feature for me. Can"t wait! Any progress so far? To be clear: This is NOT actuall SSO, it just adds dubble authentication with...

> To be clear on the whole SSO support of Bitwarden (and thus Vaultwarden if it will be implemented). It is only used to verify if a user has access,...

@SuNNjek Try checking in the docker itself if the image is actually there. Somethings you need a different reference for different platforms for certain libraries. Something like this top open...

@stanelie be aware you don't even actually "authenticate" against the bitwarden server afaik. You authenticate your password in the client against a local datablob (recieved from the server), the result...

@jhf2442 - This is formost a client side (UI) issue from Bitwarden, only after Bitwarden themselves adds this feature should/could it be added to bitwarden_rs. Bitwarden_rs doesn't maintain the clientside...

@mprasil Indeed, the whole idea is based on a flawed interprentation of how Bitwarden works: 1. "password is sent to server" Which it isn't. 2. "Bitwarden server authenticates" Which it...