Pieter Cardillo Kwok

@zulipbot add "area: integrations" "documentation review" "maintainer review"

Update: added more tests to 100% coverage. @timabbott Hi Tim, hope you're not too busy with GSOC stuff and other issues. Would you mind giving a quick follow up for...

Update: Adjusted the doc format to better follow changes in #29592

@laurynmm thanks for the feedbacks! Here's what the doc currently looks like:  If there are any more changes you'd like to suggest, feel free to leave another comment!

> @PieterCK Looks like there are some test failures to fix for this PR to be ready for the next round of review. Fixed it. Looking forward for your review...

Ah, thank you for pointing it out. I'll not forget to do that next time

Hello @terpimost, thanks for reviewing this PR. Here's what the table looks like on different scale of opacity including 0.5. **tables on different opacity scale:** | 0.4 Opacity | 0.5...

Update: included the new table border color css for the tables in preview message 

> These colors and other values should be expressed as CSS variables; let's not go the route of adding more lines to `dark_theme.css`. > > To do this, you'll likely...

> 0.4 is better, but I think we can even do 0.2 Here's some screenshots with the 0.2 opacity!  _on different opacity scale:_ | 0.2 Opacity | 0.4 Opacity...